Volume > Issue > Abortion: The Hard Cases

Abortion: The Hard Cases

WHAT IS THE COMPASSIONATE RESPONSE?

By Jacqueline R. Kasun | September 1983
Jacqueline R. Kasun is Professor of Economics at Humboldt State University in Arcata, California.

Opinion polls clearly show that a majority of Americans do not believe abortion should be avail­able as a convenience. Probably an even greater ma­jority among Christians would agree that abortion should not be available “on demand” or “on re­quest.” Many otherwise informed Christians and others are startled upon first learning that abortion is now available on precisely such terms through­out the United States. The Supreme Court deci­sions of 1973 effectively removed all restrictions on abortion, so that a woman can now have an abortion at any time during her pregnancy for any reason or for no reason. Though the Court stated that access to abortion might be restricted in the last trimester of pregnancy, it hedged this provision with an exception: abortion could not be restricted where it was “necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.” And her “health” needs were to be assessed by herself and her abortionist in terms of what they regarded as “‘appropriate’…though perhaps not ‘necessary,’ in a strict sense,” said the Court.

In other words, at present any woman who has decided that an abortion is “appropriate” or convenient for her has only to find a willing abortionist in order to have one. One has only to glance in the Yellow Pages of the telephone book to see that there is no lack of willing abortionists. The procedure, in fact, is so free of restrictions that there is not even any legal requirement in many jurisdictions to report that it has taken place. Sub­sequent Court decisions have determined, moreov­er, that this so-called “right” to abortion may not be restricted by any spousal or parental authority, even if the “woman” in question is a minor child. A young woman or female child of any age may have an abortion regardless of the wishes of her parents or the father of her child.

There now occur an estimated 1.5 million abortions each year in the U.S. Approximately one child in every four conceived is now aborted — that is, killed — by medical-surgical means prior to its birth. The mothers of these victims are for the most part young, healthy, unmarried women in their late teens or early 20s. The evidence is that abortion is now, in fact, a commonly used form of “birth control.” Knowing that it is freely available, a significant number of young women have become pregnancy risk-takers, not taking precautions to prevent conception but risking it, knowing that if it occurs it can be terminated at what appears to be a moderate cost.

In common with the other great religions of the world, Christianity has, of course, forbidden abortion since the earliest times. This proscription was apparently long understood to be subsumed under the Sixth Commandment, but was made ex­plicit in the Epistle of Barnabas in about A.D. 130: “Never do away with an unborn child, or destroy it after its birth.” Again in the collection of instruc­tions for Christian living known as Didache (“The Teaching”) compiled in about 150, the admonition appears: “Commit no murder, adultery, sodomy, fornication, or theft. Practice no magic, sorcery, abortion, or infanticide.”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIAL

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You May Also Enjoy

Surveillance of the Unborn: A Human Rights Issue

While the March of Dimes may do valuable work toward helping conquer birth defects, other unborn handicapped children are denied life because of its support of prenatal testing.

My Catholic Hospital's Cooperation with Evil

My local Catholic hospital, where I have been on the staff as an internal-medicine specialist…

Dissecting the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban

What is one to do, when faced with a yes or no decision that is…