Volume > Issue > Is President Trump Really Pro-Life?

Is President Trump Really Pro-Life?

COVENANT & CIVILIZATION

By Marcus Peter |
Dr. Marcus Peter is a Scripture scholar, theologian, philosopher, and commentator on the intersection of faith and culture. He is Director of Theology for Ave Maria Radio and the Kresta Institute, host of the daily EWTN radio program Ave Maria in the Afternoon, and host of the television program Unveiling the Covenants. He is a prolific author and international speaker, and readers may follow his work at marcusbpeter.com.

In conservative Catholic circles, one often hears the boast that Donald Trump is “the most pro-life” U.S. president in modern memory. Let’s interrogate that claim.

This January the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) restored tens of millions of dollars of Title X funds to Planned Parenthood it had withheld earlier, thereby allowing Planned Parenthood to submit reimbursement claims for contraception and related services for low-income patients. Formally speaking, the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal dollars from directly funding abortion procedures, remains in place. Practically speaking, taxpayer money is again funding an organization responsible for hundreds of thousands of abortions each year, thereby subsidizing the infrastructure, personnel, and operational capacity of the abortion industry. This distinction between direct and indirect support has long functioned as a moral fig leaf in Washington, although its persuasive power has worn thin among those who understand how large institutions operate.

When asked about the refunding, President Trump responded, “I don’t know anything about that,” while HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. added, “I have not heard that.” These statements may reflect genuine distance from agency-level decisions, but they appear to be merely political deflection. Either way, the effect remains the same, as policy outcomes can shape societal moral reality far more decisively than flippant press-room disclaimers. In this respect, the controversy has already accomplished something jarring: It has exposed the danger of outsourcing moral vigilance to politicians.

Reactions within the pro-life movement were swift and divided. Organizations such as the American Life League and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America demanded a complete defunding of Planned Parenthood and the immediate reinstatement of the Protect Life Rule from Trump’s first term, which prevented taxpayer money from funding abortion activity. Lila Rose of Live Action declared that Planned Parenthood “kills 1,102 babies daily with your taxpaying dollars. We must fully defund abortion corporation Planned Parenthood!”

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

An American Hodgepodge of Religious Kookery

The temptation to be religiously promiscuous is simply how Protestantism works. Once the individual is the axis, the whole world takes the shape of the ego exalted.

Symposium on Catholics & American Political Life

How are Catholics to fulfill their vocation as more than mere citizens given the waning influence of the Church in public life and the grim sociopolitical outlook?

The Gospel of Greed

What began as a removal of religious questions from the public square morphed into a draining of religion and practically all virtue from Americans’ purview.