Volume > Issue > The Tyranny of Inexorable Technological Change

The Tyranny of Inexorable Technological Change

EDITORIAL

By Dale Vree | November 1988
Dale Vree is Editor of New Oxford Review.

Over the years, the NEW OXFORD REVIEW has had some portentous things to say about the juggernaut of technology. For example, many of the persons listed on our masthead have, in these pages and/or elsewhere, sounded the alarm: we think especially of Sheldon Vanauken, Walker Per­cy, John Lukacs, Juli Loesch, Christopher Lasch, Peter Kreeft, Christopher Derrick, James J. Thomp­son Jr., and James G. Hanink.

It can therefore only be poetic injustice that the NOR has now fallen victim to the dictates of technological obsolescence.

We’ve known for a while that our old, rickety IBM composer (on which we set type for the maga­zine and on which we did regular subscriber list maintenance) would have to be replaced by January 1, 1990, because replacement parts will no longer be made after that date. Why is this? Because techno­logical progress declared that machine — and any comparable machine — to be obsolete.

Worse still, disaster struck earlier than antici­pated, and we lost the “luxury” of waiting until January 1, 1990, to replace our old composer with our first computer. Here’s what happened:

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

Back in the U.S.S.R.

President Bush is worried that Vladimir Putin is heading toward an authoritarian regime: Moscow has banned a 'Gay Pride' parade -- very un-democratic.

The Catholic Hiroshima

Dissent affects spiritual life in a way that is analogous to what happens to biological life in the aftermath of an atomic bomb.

Letter to the Editor: December 1990

Offensive & Completely False... Feminist Bluejays... Contraception & "Sexual Strip-Mining"... Focus on Walker Percy