Volume > Issue > The Shaping of Anglican Spiritual Expression

The Shaping of Anglican Spiritual Expression

The Anglican Spiritual Tradition

By John R.H. Moorman

Publisher: Templegate

Pages: 228

Price: $10.95

Review Author: Isabel Anders

Isabel Anders, an Episcopalian, is a Chicago freelance writer and editor.

The Anglican Spiritual Tradition is both Catholic and Protestant. It is Catholic first of all in its forms of worship. “An­glican worship,” wrote Evelyn Underhill, “is a special development of the tradi­tional Christian culture, and not merely a variant of continental Protestantism.” That is to say that it keeps a fixed litur­gy, allowing no place for extemporary prayer or self-devised services of praise and preaching such as are common in nonconformist bodies. It is Catholic also in its maintenance of the threefold ministry of bishops, priests and deacons.

John R.H. Moorman, retired Church of En­gland Bishop of Ripon, goes on to quote Underhill again:

The student of Anglicanism can find there a complete Evangelicalism: grave, Biblical, prophetic, devoted, based on preaching of the Word, suspicious of cer­emonies, acts and signs, emphasising the personal relation of the soul to God, greatly concerned with man and his needs. At the same time he can find a sacramental, objective, theocentric wor­ship, emphasising holiness, authority and the total action of the Church, her call to adoration and vocation of sacrifice.

In this book, which traces the shaping of Anglican spiritual expression since the Reformation, one finds “all of the above” in various degrees of com­patibility and contradiction, ease and disease, tur­moil and agreeable diversity.

In a fascinating prologue, Moorman tells the story of a fictitious English priest ordained in 1524 during the reign of King Henry VIII. The Rev. “James Whyte” of Essex is destined to live through serious changes in the Church he knows and serves during the course of his ministry: the act of separation of the Church of England from Rome, the command for each parish church to set up a Bible in English (although few in his parish are able to read), the Statute of Six Articles in 1539 (which gives false hope that the King does not in­tend to change the church life of the people).

Then, at the end of January 1547, when news reaches him of the King’s death, and the succession of his nine-year-old son (under the advisorship of the Protectors), the real changes begin to occur. Within 10 years (1549-1559), the Rev. Whyte will be forced to undergo four official major reversals, back and forth from Protestant and Catholic poles, which will affect the forms of public worship, the appearance of his Church, his own vestments, and the sermons and teaching he will be required to pass on to his flock. But in the process, meaningful changes occur.

This story gives a taste of the beginnings of the Church of England’s long and complicated spir­itual windings. In the succeeding chapters, Moor­man covers the historical track of Anglican names and places and issues (with an emphasis on the im­plications for individual and corporate worship, and devotional life), the development of the Book of Common Prayer, and the place of the English Bible in the Church. He looks at developing hymnody and its influence on worship, the spiritual and apologetic writings that grew out of the Church’s life, and the individuals who helped shape the Church in their time and for our time.

In the constant attempt to define the nature of this Church, to balance its catholicity against its reformed tendencies, many writers have struggled with fine distinctions — such as John Whitgift, who wrote about the nature of the Anglican Church (1573, 1574) and its worship:

That no ceremony, order, discipline or kind of government may be in the Church, except the same be expressed in the Word of God, is a great absurdity and breedeth many inconveniences.

Whitgift, Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, was answering the attacks on Rome by another Angli­can writer, John Jewel (b. 1522), whose Apology, rather than defending Canterbury, sought to ex­clude Rome. Whitgift was called upon in true An­glican fashion to build bridges, to answer the points of Puritans, yet also to avoid being reaction­ary — to help preserve by his language the spirit, ethos, and practicality of developing Anglicanism. He appealed to reasonable minds, supported the in­evitable development of doctrine and liturgy that is the legacy of the Church, and in his voluminous writings he stated the Anglican view of the nature of the Church, its government, worship, and cus­toms, and helped preserve — as Anglicans call it — the English branch of catholic expression of the faith. Through writers, preachers, proclaimers of the Word such as Whitgift — more and less well known — the Anglican Church survives today, its spirituality (in the words of Martin Thornton):

sane, wise, ancient, modern, sound, and simple; with roots in the New Testament and the Fathers, and of noble pedigree; with its golden periods and its full quota of saints and doctors; never obtrusive, seldom in serious error, ever holding its essential place within the glorious diver­sity of Catholic Christendom.

 

©1984 New Oxford Review. All Rights Reserved.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! GET A FREE 7 DAY TRIAL

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

You May Also Enjoy

The New Archbishop of Canterbury

Many Anglicans breathed a deep sigh of relief when Archbishop Robert Runcie arrived at the…

God’s Good Servant, but the King’s First?

Thomas Cranmer was one of the overseers of what Diarmaid MacCulloch calls “a religious revolution of ruthless thoroughness.”

God the Father, the Elephantine God — Whatever

There are still Catholic bishops who believe that a Third Vatican Council could authorize priestesses and bishopettes.