Volume > Issue > Note List > Condom-mania, the Rerun

Condom-mania, the Rerun

Here we go again. It’s been about sixteen months since the last outbreak, but papal condom-mania has resurfaced. This time, however, it’s taken a slightly different form. During the last brouhaha over the Catholic Church’s teaching on the use of condoms to combat the spread of AIDS, apoplectic gay-rights activists and their media mouthpieces lit into Pope Benedict XVI for a fleeting comment he made to a reporter on his way to Cam­eroon in March 2009. When asked by a French reporter whether the Church’s approach to AIDS prevention — which focuses primarily on sexual responsibility and rejects condom campaigns — was “unrealistic and ineffective,” the Pope replied, “One cannot overcome the problem [of AIDS] with the distribution of condoms. On the contrary, they increase the problem.”

The Holy Father was accused of being ignorant of basic health facts, contributing to the suffering and death of millions — it’s always millions — in the Third World, and being generally out of touch with the realities of the twenty-first century. But Benedict’s brief comment was merely a statement of evidenced fact. Western “family-planning” organizations have long been distributing condoms to millions throughout African nations. Even so, condoms have not been working to stem the AIDS epidemic on the continent. In fact, the opposite is true: Condoms have been a significant factor contributing to the spread of the disease for the simple reason that condoms are, at most hopeful estimates, only ninety-percent effective against the transmission of the HIV virus. Bottom line: Condoms, when distributed indiscriminately, tend to promote promiscuity and worsen the crisis. Only abstinence and fidelity can provide a long-term solution to ending the AIDS pandemic. (See our May 2009 New Oxford Note “Condom Worshipers & their Perennial Bogeymen” for an analysis of this issue.)

This time around it’s a few sentences from Light of the World, Pope Benedict’s new book-length interview with German journalist Peter Seewald, published by Ignatius Press, that has whipped the media into a frenzy and turned the heads of AIDS campaigners. The least knowledgeable and knee-jerking among them quickly conjectured that the pontiff had made a “U-turn” on Catholic teaching against “contraception,” even though using condoms to prevent the spread of infection has nothing to do with contraception (homosexuals who engage in sex acts, for example, have nothing to contracept).

The formerly apoplectic gay-rights activists are now rubbing their hands together gleefully in the apparent belief that the Holy Father’s comments represent a “dramatic shift in Church teaching.” In other words, they believe that Pope Benedict XVI is now their advocate — an old coot who has finally realized that the gay-activist crowd has been right all along. They actually seem to think that Pope Benedict is now approving and promoting the use of condoms to combat the spread of HIV.

If that sounds dubious, you’re right — it is!

Enjoyed reading this?



You May Also Enjoy

Is Benedict to Blame?

Vatican II's vaunted reforms couldn't keep Catholics from being swept away from the Church. There wasn't much Pope Benedict XVI could do to stop this, and surely he can't be blamed for it.

"He Doesn't Want to Upset People"

Father Joseph Fessio seems a little disappointed that his close friend Pope Benedict XVI appointed Cardinal Levada to an important Vatican post.

A Dialogue of Forms

The Extraordinary Form and Ordinary Form sat down to discuss the first eight years of their formal co-existence, and invited me to record and moderate the conversation.