Volume > Issue > Priestly Celibacy: An Eschatological Vanguard

Priestly Celibacy: An Eschatological Vanguard

A HOLOCAUST IN IMITATION OF CHRIST

By John Paul Gamage | March 2024
John Paul Gamage is an undergraduate at the University of British Columbia and an intern at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Early last year, Pope Francis hinted that the Catholic Church could review the discipline of celibacy for priests, calling it a “temporary prescription.” He said this just days after the German bishops approved a document urging him to re-examine the practice. At the outset of Francis’s reign, 60 percent of American Catholics thought it would be good if the Holy Father allowed married priests in the Latin Church.

Pope St. Pius X, in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), wrote that “suppression of ecclesiastical celibacy” is part of an agenda “guided by the principles of Modernism,” which he famously defined as “the synthesis of all heresies.” Efforts to suppress priestly celibacy are neither unique to our day nor an issue isolated from other currents of the Zeitgeist.

Between these two popes, the now-forgotten yet once-famous German writer Ida Friederike Görres (1901-1971) witnessed another round of attacks on priestly celibacy. In response, she offered a wealth of wisdom that remains relevant today. Görres spent her adult life writing about the Church, saints, marriage, virginity, and women (for example, arguing against the ordination of women). At her funeral, then-Father Joseph Ratzinger called hers “a voice which seems irreplaceable to the Church” against “conformism” and “silence.” Her book Is Celibacy Outdated? (1965), which was translated into English in 1967 yet is, unfortunately, out of print, provides valuable insights from the past.

Görres argues that within the Church, celibacy is as necessary as marriage. The figure of the Catholic priest, she maintains, is one of the most potent and magnificent images of virility and humanity known to history. And celibacy is the most expressive form of the office of Christ’s representative.

Enjoyed reading this?

READ MORE! REGISTER TODAY

SUBSCRIBE

You May Also Enjoy

New Oxford Notes: March 2008

Don't Just Search, Good Search... First Impressions Are Often Correct... Reinforcements Are on the Way... Not Peace, But a Sword...

New Oxford Notes: July-August 2001

Vengeance Is NOT Mine, Says "the Lord"... To Be Porn-Free Is to Be Second Class?... In Praise of "Coming Out" (Or: You Tell and We'll Ask)... Opposed to Abortion, But... "More Egocentric Than Theocentric"

The Return of the Physician-Executioner

We would do well to heed the lesson of Deuteronomy 30:19 (Choose life…"), rather than the teachings of "ethicists" who cannot distinguish human babies from fish.