Last Judgment (Lite)
TOPSY-TURVY ESCHATOLOGY
One critic has trenchantly observed that today’s dissident theologians are really closet ultramontanes: They are devoted to the teaching of the next Holy Father, whom they expect will “reform” Church teaching to their liking. The problem is that such a Pope never materializes.
Such expectations were dominant in the mid-1970s — in the latter years of Pope Paul VI’s pontificate. The same voices (from many of the same people) are again being heard, claiming that once Wojtyla is gone, a new Pope will get us back on the road to utopia.
Since the Holy Spirit apparently did not co-operate during the 1978 conclaves, some dissidents are now hedging their bets. John Hogue, however, projects his bets onto the end of the world! In his book The Last Pope: The Decline and Fall of the Church of Rome, Hogue uses the “Prophecies of St. Malachy” as a backdrop to advance his politically-correct views. The prophecies are supposedly the visions of the Irishman, St. Malachy, predicting each of the Popes who would reign between his time and the end of the world. According to the prophecies, two are left: John Paul II’s successor, and the Pope who reigns at the end of the world.
Malachy’s “prophecies” usually consist of a brief phrase about each Pope, often highly enigmatic and patient of varying interpretations (the “correct” one usually the result of Monday morning quarterbacking). Catholics now await the last two popes: “De Gloria Olivae” (the Glory of the Olive), followed by “Petrus Romanus” (Peter the Roman).
You May Also Enjoy
According to the "Prophecies of St. Malachy," only two popes would follow John Paul II: "De Gloria Olivae" (the Glory of the Olive) and "Petrus Romanus" (Peter the Roman).
In the absence of a credible dormition narrative from the early Church, is there any other source to turn to for a plausible description?
The USCCB has taken the opportunity to clarify ambiguities in its document on Catholic-Jewish relations.