They dont because theyre not given any good reason to do so.
Evangelization, upon which the Church stands or falls, has unfortunately become a mere buzzword in the contemporary Church it is frequently invoked, it sounds impressive, but it has very little substance. As an example of whats wrong, lets consider an article in a Catholic magazine about evangelization.
The article starts out rather well: Evangelization is the proclamation of Christ and His Gospel by word and example . The Churchs fundamental mission is to call all people to be reconciled to God through Jesus Christ.
Then things get murky. We read that The liturgy and sacraments are tools of evangelization inasmuch as they have the power to invigorate the natural life with supernatural power . This makes little sense, for in order to receive the sacrament you must already have been evangelized. Yes, to receive Holy Communion may give one the desire to go out and evangelize, but, lets be honest, thats rarely seen.
Then theres a lengthy section on how social justice is essential to evangelization. It may be, but the author does not make his case. He writes: Interestingly, Matthew 25:25-46 is speaking of the final judgment. Christ does not judge the nations based on whether or how well anyone preached. He asks whether the hungry and thirsty were given food and drink, whether the naked were clothed, and whether the sick or imprisoned were visited. One could get the impression from this that we are saved exclusively by our good works surely whoever wrote this knows better. But the problem here is that when we feed the hungry, we are advancing our own salvation, not the salvation of the hungry. So is this really evangelization?
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.