Given all the controversy about our seminaries, we approached Fr. Robert Johansens Whats Wrong With Our Seminaries? An Insider Speaks Out in Crisis magazine (May) with considerable interest. What qualifies Johansen as an insider is never made clear, other than he attended seminary. Of course, there are some 45,000 priests in the U.S., so theyd all be insiders too. Yes, we know Crisis likes to appeal to our instinct for the sensational and the secretive (e.g., see Janel Eastons letter in this issue), but to call Johansen an insider is really devaluing the currency of an insider.
Nonetheless, Johansen says a lot of good things. He says, The first requirement of any seminary is that it must be orthodox . He says seminary classes must demand intellectual rigor. He denounces proportionalism and consequentialism in moral theology. He expresses skepticism about the heavy reliance on the historical-critical method in biblical studies. He says seminaries must celebrate the liturgy with reverence, and must give more emphasis to spirituality.
But suddenly the tone changes when it comes to homosexuality in the seminaries. Yes, Johansen admits that the priestly sex scandals have led many to conclude that the real problem is homosexuality within the priesthood. This conclusion has occasioned calls for barring homosexuals from ordination and admission to the seminary. He acknowledges that It appears that Rome is also leaning in this direction: In a September  address to the bishops of Brazil, the pope called for the exclusion from Holy Orders of men having obvious signs of affective deviations, meaning homosexual orientation. Furthermore, in December , Jorge Cardinal Medina Estevez, then-prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, wrote that a person who is homosexual or has homosexual tendencies is not suitable to receive the sacrament of sacred orders. Many Rome-watchers believe the Holy See will soon issue a directive confirming that position.
But Johansen pooh-poohs any such directive, saying it would only have strictly symbolic value because it is not really needed. Alas, it seems that most Vatican directives, when they hit American shores, have strictly symbolic value i.e., are not enforced because bishops think theyre not needed.
Why is such a directive not needed? Because, says Johansen, The perception of most seminary rectors, faculty, and students is that theres no longer a widespread homosexual subculture in our seminaries (at least in most of them). The efforts at cleaning up this problem began more than a decade ago and have largely been successful. So on what basis does Johansen make this grandiose claim about the perception of most seminary rectors, faculty, and students?
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.