Fr. Charles Curran has failed as a Catholic theologian. He knows hes failed. And he wants us to know hes failed. More importantly, he wants us to know that he knows hes failed.
How does Fr. Curran say hes failed? Is it by publicly dissenting against Bl. Pope Paul VIs encyclical Humanae Vitae in the 1960s with his statement that spouses may responsibly decide according to their conscience that artificial contraception in some circumstances is permissible and indeed necessary to preserve and foster the value and sacredness of marriage? Well, no.
Is it by insisting in the 1970s that the official hierarchical Roman Catholic teaching should accept the moral value and goodness of same-sex relationships and that homosexual actions between committed partners are in a true sense objectively good? Sorry, no.
Is it by promoting a host of other errors and ambiguities, as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) put it, in the 1980s, such as his rejection of the Churchs judgments on the immorality of masturbation, abortion, homosexual acts, and premarital sex? Or his denial of the Churchs basic competency to teach definitively on moral issues, the existence of intrinsically evil acts, the indissolubility of marriage, the all-male priesthood, and the possibility that any single moral choice can be mortally sinful? Nope.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.