Condom-mania, the Rerun

January-February 2011

Here we go again. It’s been about sixteen months since the last outbreak, but papal condom-mania has resurfaced. This time, however, it’s taken a slightly different form. During the last brouhaha over the Catholic Church’s teaching on the use of condoms to combat the spread of AIDS, apoplectic gay-rights activists and their media mouthpieces lit into Pope Benedict XVI for a fleeting comment he made to a reporter on his way to Cam­eroon in March 2009. When asked by a French reporter whether the Church’s approach to AIDS prevention — which focuses primarily on sexual responsibility and rejects condom campaigns — was “unrealistic and ineffective,” the Pope replied, “One cannot overcome the problem [of AIDS] with the distribution of condoms. On the contrary, they increase the problem.”

The Holy Father was accused of being ignorant of basic health facts, contributing to the suffering and death of millions — it’s always millions — in the Third World, and being generally out of touch with the realities of the twenty-first century. But Benedict’s brief comment was merely a statement of evidenced fact. Western “family-planning” organizations have long been distributing condoms to millions throughout African nations. Even so, condoms have not been working to stem the AIDS epidemic on the continent. In fact, the opposite is true: Condoms have been a significant factor contributing to the spread of the disease for the simple reason that condoms are, at most hopeful estimates, only ninety-percent effective against the transmission of the HIV virus. Bottom line: Condoms, when distributed indiscriminately, tend to promote promiscuity and worsen the crisis. Only abstinence and fidelity can provide a long-term solution to ending the AIDS pandemic. (See our May 2009 New Oxford Note “Condom Worshipers & their Perennial Bogeymen” for an analysis of this issue.)

This time around it’s a few sentences from Light of the World, Pope Benedict’s new book-length interview with German journalist Peter Seewald, published by Ignatius Press, that has whipped the media into a frenzy and turned the heads of AIDS campaigners. The least knowledgeable and knee-jerking among them quickly conjectured that the pontiff had made a “U-turn” on Catholic teaching against “contraception,” even though using condoms to prevent the spread of infection has nothing to do with contraception (homosexuals who engage in sex acts, for example, have nothing to contracept).

The formerly apoplectic gay-rights activists are now rubbing their hands together gleefully in the apparent belief that the Holy Father’s comments represent a “dramatic shift in Church teaching.” In other words, they believe that Pope Benedict XVI is now their advocate — an old coot who has finally realized that the gay-activist crowd has been right all along. They actually seem to think that Pope Benedict is now approving and promoting the use of condoms to combat the spread of HIV.

If that sounds dubious, you’re right — it is!


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



New Oxford Notes: January-February 2011

Read our posting policy Add a comment
This reminds me of a number of passages in Ven. Sis. Mary of Agreda's Mystical City of God where the Serpent, the Father of Lies, everytime he tries to ruin God's plan, ends up being humiliated by his own presumptuous follies, 'goes back to the drawing board', convenes his fellow fallen angels and device new schemes. One who truly endeavors to love our Lord with our Blessed Mother and our Holy Mother Church, cannot but perceive, somewhat amused as well, the parallelism between how Satan, the ape of God (together witrh his co-fallen angels) operates and how the powers of earth - politicians, decrepit media, pseudo-philosophers, ideological 'scientists', homosexual advocates, etc. - conduct their nefarious wares only to be thrown back to the deeper recesses of hell by God's uncreated wisdom. "...not even the gates of hell..." Posted by: humblesoldier2
January 27, 2011 01:13 AM EST
Add a comment


©