You may remember the letter from Michael Murad and our editorial reply (Jul.-Aug. 2000) wherein Msgr. M. Francis Mannions apparent difficulty in coming to terms with the physicality of the Real Presence and the Incarnation was discussed. In regard to the Incarnation, Msgr. Mannion had said in one of his regular Q&A columns for Our Sunday Visitor that depicting Jesus as a woman does not bother me at all.
Well, Mannion wasnt deterred by that commentary in the NOR. In his Q&A column in the Visitor for October 1, 2000, Mannion tells us that its just fine to call Jesus mother. Mother? Mannion cites four venerable medieval figures to support his view, one of whom, Anselm of Canterbury, he quotes: But You, Jesus . are You not that mother who, like a hen, collects her children under her wings? Truly, master, You are a mother. Mannion approves of this on the grounds that its poetic. No doubt Mannion would also approve if Anselm had written (to be consistent and even more poetic), Truly, mistress, You are a mother.
Yes, theres such a thing as poetic license, but not everything that flies under that banner is good poetics, and even good poetry can make for lousy, indiscriminate theology.
Lets be properly theological! Its incongruous to call Jesus mother, not only because Jesus was male but because we already have our Blessed Mother. Besides, if its legit to call Jesus mother, then why wouldnt it be kosher to call the Blessed Virgin Mary son if that strikes our poetic fancy? Alas, such absurdist sexual confusion produces a severe case of mental cramps.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.