Is Benedict to Blame?

December 2015

We’re all familiar with the dismal statistics: The Catholic Church has suffered massive numerical losses since the close of the Second Vatican Council in virtually every category: baptisms, marriages, holy orders, Mass attendance, school enrollment, you name it. Naturally, this deplorable situation has caused Catholics concerned about the condition of their Church to cast about for someone, something — anything — to blame. And the blame often falls on Vatican II, or rather its embattled legacy. If Vatican II itself is not condemned as the cause of the current crisis, then its implementation is: Critics either contend that the Council’s mandates were not fully implemented or that, somewhere along the way, the implementation went haywire.

Arguing in favor of the former, Commonweal columnist Rita Ferrone poses a provocative question, set forth in the title of her article, “Late to the Font: Whatever Happened to Adult Baptism?” (Oct. 9).

Adult baptism is, of course, the initiation rite of adult converts to the faith. As such, it is a handy barometer of how many converts the Church is attracting at any given point in time.

So, how are we doing? The answer, as you might expect, is: not good. Ferrone informs us that adult baptisms in the U.S. “fell by a startling 43 percent between 2005 and 2013.”

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

New Oxford Notes: December 2015

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Benedict XVIII was the victim of a demonic purge and the bloodletting of the church of Jesus Christ, both figuratively and literally, is only just about to begin.

We needed someone as pope such as the late Archbishop Fulton Sheen, who knew and detested Marxism and -- unlike so many others today -- was not afraid to speak up and educate people. But instead we got Francis, who speaks too often and thinks the Marxist adjunct of social justice is the answer, though bountiful evidence exits worldwide to the contrary, including his own Argentina.
Posted by: j17ghs
March 04, 2016 04:53 PM EST
Wow, sad that a perfectly reasonable comment was deleted. The NOR claims to be unafraid and whatnot, except when it comes to well-informed assertions that challenge the premise of the article. Ratzinger was a modernist; if you don't know that, then you either don't know what modernism is; or, you don't understand Ratzinger's basic orientation and theology. Or, both. Posted by: Micawber
January 28, 2016 11:09 AM EST
Add a comment