Charles Curran Makes a Confession
Fr. Charles Curran has failed as a Catholic theologian. He knows hes failed. And he wants us to know hes failed. More importantly, he wants us to know that he knows hes failed.
How does Fr. Curran say hes failed? Is it by publicly dissenting against Bl. Pope Paul VIs encyclical Humanae Vitae in the 1960s with his statement that spouses may responsibly decide according to their conscience that artificial contraception in some circumstances is permissible and indeed necessary to preserve and foster the value and sacredness of marriage? Well, no.
Is it by insisting in the 1970s that the official hierarchical Roman Catholic teaching should accept the moral value and goodness of same-sex relationships and that homosexual actions between committed partners are in a true sense objectively good? Sorry, no.
Is it by promoting a host of other errors and ambiguities, as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) put it, in the 1980s, such as his rejection of the Churchs judgments on the immorality of masturbation, abortion, homosexual acts, and premarital sex? Or his denial of the Churchs basic competency to teach definitively on moral issues, the existence of intrinsically evil acts, the indissolubility of marriage, the all-male priesthood, and the possibility that any single moral choice can be mortally sinful? Nope.
You have two options:
Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
Single article purchase:
Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.
New Oxford Notes: September 2016
|Read our posting policy
||Add a comment
|Fr. Curran could have saved a lot of ink by simply declaring himself to be a gender neutral, black and thus all of his reflections would not need to be labeled as being written from a white privileged point of view and thus written purely from his deepest, intellectual understanding at the time they originated. this would satisfy all critics including himself.
||Posted by: pescher
September 07, 2016 12:12 PM EDT
|Words have no color. Not one of us has seen Truth, the man Himself. But, we believe the words He spoke. How soothing to the ego are academic freedoms. What's the one about, 'it's not what goes in that is evil, but what comes out' [my paraphrasing]? Who has been given more and, therefore, must be more careful of spoken words? To the one who been given much, is it blaspheming the Holy Spirit to scatter the flock? Maybe included in those Words of mercy, 'Father, forgive them for they know not what they do', is mercy for those who do not choose their words wisely. For this, we pray.
||Posted by: lilio31
September 07, 2016 03:06 PM EDT
|Add a comment
The child-abuse Commission's final report attacks priestly celibacy and the confessional seal.
The USCCB's marriage initiative announces a podcast that presents Church teaching via clever audio storytelling.
In the Pope's Guadalupe feast day homily, he says Latin America must be defended from ideological colonization.
Cinemas will open to the public in 2018, as another step in the Crown Prince's touted liberalization plan.
The likely next prime minister says his dream is to 're-Christianize the EU.'
Christian leaders decry Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
more news links...