Noblesse Oblige

September 2006

Fr. Timothy Radcliffe, the Master General of the Dominican Order from 1992 to 2001, is a descendant of old English nobility. He gave a talk on April 1 on healing divisions in the Church at the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress, and that he gave it there arouses suspicions.

The speech was adapted in the National Catholic Reporter (May 5) under the title "Overcoming Discord in the Church." Tom Roberts, the Editor of the Reporter, described him as a "modern Catholic," and John L. Allen Jr., the Vatican Correspondent for the Reporter, said that Radcliffe is known for his "sensitivity" and is "typically cast as a liberal." So, suspicions confirmed.

In his "Overcoming Discord in the Church," he mentions that John L. Allen Jr., in an earlier report in the Reporter, said that "liberals talk about dialogue, conservatives about truth.... As a result, the term 'dialogue' is by now ideologically charged and therefore unhelpful." Radcliffe responds: "I would like to stand up for dialogue. It is not just a trendy liberal idea.... But if one is going to get dialogue going, then one has to be very sensitive to how people hear words, and there is no point in getting off to a bad start. So let's try another word, conversation." As if that makes a difference.

Now, Radcliffe is a nobleman, so he has to be benevolent to hoi polloi. No way can he be hoity-toity. It's noblesse oblige all the way. So Radcliffe says that conservative Catholics feel betrayed: "They endured the loss of beloved traditions, ways of celebrating the liturgy, a sense of a Catholic world. Nuns threw away their habits, and it seemed that you could believe and do whatever you liked.... So the first thing that we must do is to get some feel of the loss of home that 'the other side' feels. We must get some sense of their pain in exile."

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

New Oxford Notes: September 2006

Read our posting policy Add a comment
It is amazing how these "thinkers" wind up sounding like Bill Clinton, "I feel your pain." The Gospel is a proclamation before it is a dialogue. "I believe so that I can understand." Fr. Radcliffe and others who consider themselves "liberal" want to dialogue in order to question every one of the basic beliefs of the Church and imply that each belief is not always and everywhere true. They keep trying to reinvent the Catholic Faith and accept very little as being Divinely revealed Truth. The dialogue comes after the Truth is accepted in order to understand how it is to be lived, especially in how worship is rendered to God alone. If Fr. Radcliffe and others want to go "deeper" they should seek deeper understanding of any phrase in any of the Creeds, the Bible or the official Liturgy of the Church. Then they can help others understand the Faith and to live in a Catholic manner. Much time and energy is wasted debating what should not be debated. Posted by: wicker58
July 23, 2009 04:51 PM EDT
Add a comment