It's Time for Another Free Speech Movement
If youre but a creature of your times, youre accustomed to saying humankind instead of mankind, firefighter instead of fireman, letter carrier instead of mailman, businessperson instead of businessman, etc. We believe our readers are immune from cultural conditioning and linguistic engineering, so were not talking about you. But pity the zombies, for theres a lot more Newspeak for them to assimilate.
But before getting to that, something needs to be said about the avoidance of man in a compound word. The erudite Jacques Barzun, in his book Dawn to Decadence, explained succinctly why man is correct usage: In the compounds that have been regarded as invidious spokesman, chairman, and the like man retains that original sense of human being, as is proved by the word woman
. Or as the whimsical Sheldon Vanauken versified in the September 1978 NEW OXFORD REVIEW:
Her unisex temper would worsen
If as chairman she wasnt chairperson:
She required that we ban
Those damned suffixes, man
So now shes become a woperson.
But most people dont understand how the English language works, and so are easy targets for the mind-controllers.
You have two options:
Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
Single article purchase:
Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.
New Oxford Notes: April 2003
|Read our posting policy
||Add a comment
|If you don't read the book, you won't have to worry about this irrelevant garbage. I don't recognize PC stuff. However, an interesting question is what is free speech, in particular what does the first amendment guarantee. These days too many people seem to think that any speech, no matter how inappropriate or vile, is covered by the constitution. NOt so. Besides, although you are free to speak your mind, the other is free to respond as he feels it necessary to do so. Of course it works both ways, you are responsible for your words and actions. Mankind seems to be regressing these days in this area.
||Posted by: wunsch
May 17, 2007 05:52 PM EDT
|Add a comment
A press report claims that 20 of 39 senior clerics were involved in covering up abuse of children between 1945 and 2010.
A CNN poll finds only 48% of Americans have a favorable view of Pope Francis, down from two thirds a year and a half ago.
The Pope tells a large group of Jesuits that the abuse scandal 'has behind it a Church that is elitist and clericalist.'
As Cardinal DiNardo meets with Pope Francis about the abuse crisis, two people accuse him of ignoring a priest who was arrested this week on sex
Pope Francis calls all presidents of the bishops’ conferences of the world to meet at the Vatican in February to discuss child abuse.
Six of the nine-member Council of Cardinals express 'full solidarity' with Pope Francis and reveal 'the Holy See is formulating possible
and necessary clarifications' to Vigano's allegations.
more news links...