Liturgical Winners & Losers

March 2012

The world’s English-speaking Catholics are now entering the fourth full month of worshiping according to the Third Typical Edition of the Roman Missal. This missal, which was introduced at the parish level this past Advent, provides a more accurate English translation of the Latin original than its predecessors. It has restored a number of biblical references that had been lost, added a depth and richness to the prayers, and infused the Mass with a greater sense of sacredness.

We hope that by now you’ve grown accustomed to the new phrasings required of the congregation: “And with your spirit,” “consubstantial with the Father,” “His holy Church,” “enter under my roof,” etc. Indications are that the transition to the revised missal has, for the most part, come off smoothly and successfully, save for the occasional — and inevitable — verbal hiccup committed by priest or parishioners, which with practice will soon become a thing of the past.

The revisions to the missal, which seem relatively minor from the layman’s point of view, are the result of a major undertaking. It has taken some thirty years for this third edition to work its way down to us on the ground. The decades-long process pitted liberal American prelates against their curial counterparts and, in the end, discredited the old-guard at the International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL). The final result, happily received by faithful Catholics in the pew, has driven to despair the champions of the laissez-faire liturgics that came to define Catholic worship after the Second Vatican Council.

When the bishops of the world convened for Vatican II, they agreed, almost to a man, that the Church’s liturgy was in need of renewal. The general feeling was that the time had come for a greater use of the vernacular in the liturgy. Accordingly, the first document issued by the Council Fathers was Sacrosanctum Concilium, the “Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy” (1963). It called on the Church to “undertake with great care a restoration of the liturgy,” so that the “intrinsic nature and purpose” of the Sacrifice of the Mass (yes, this term is frequently employed) “may be more clearly manifested” and, therefore, “produce its full effects.” Sacrosanctum Concilium set forth a few basic norms and general guidelines and then urged that the process be completed “as soon as possible.”

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

New Oxford Notes: March 2012

Read our posting policy Add a comment
I don't understand Bishop Trautman's and the rest of the Progressive (Liberal) Catholics mentioned in this article that say the new translation is less intelligible to the laity. Here's why:
1. For centuries the Mass (Liturgy of the Word) was said in Latin, with little or no response by the congregation. I was an altar boy during the pre-Vatican II days and I can tell you that just about 100% of the responses were in Latin and spoken by the altar boys. Now here is the kicker: In those days we had about 75% Sunday Mass attendance. Today with all the Progressive (Liberal) changes we have at most 35% Sunday Mass attendance -- a loss of over half the number we had.
2. Granted that there have been several other reasons for the loss of active membership, but a loss of that magnitude is suspiciously caused by the more Progressive (Liberal) changes.
3. In places where there is a Tridentine Mass celebrated the attendance is superb, which would not be the case if the congregation wanted a more simpler (dumbed down?) liturgy.
4. The bottom line is this: The Catholic Church is the Church of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Man is allowed to make only so many changes for the worse. Sooner or later, if active membership continues to drop, He will reach out through chosen members of the hierarchy, buttressed by strong, active members of the laity to return the Church to a status and practice which encourages, not discourages the willing and enthusiastic participation in the Mass (Liturgy of the Word).
Posted by: Correctthinker
April 12, 2012 06:17 PM EDT
Add a comment