'Gay' Is Good -- For Business
In our New Oxford Note "It's Good for Business" (Dec. 2006), we said: "According to WorldNetDaily.com (Sept. 20 ), the Human Rights Campaign, which advocates for homosexuals, reported that 'an unprecedented 138 major U.S. corporations earned the top rating of 100 percent, up from 101 last year .... Of the 138 major U.S. corporations earning 100 percent [in 2006] were American Express, Bank of America, Charles Schwab, Chevron, Coors, Daimler Chrysler, Eli Lilly, Ford, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, J.P. Morgan Chase, Mellon Financial, Morgan Stanley, Pfizer, Wells Fargo, Xerox, and a host of other companies."
WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees. It measures factors such as non-discrimination policies, diversity training and benefits for domestic partners and transgender employees. An unprecedented 195 major corporations received a perfect score, compared to just 13 companies when the index began in 2002.... Among the companies new to the list this year are Allstate Insurance, Marriott International, Macy's, MasterCard, Yahoo! and Waste Management Inc."
The major corporations are leading the way for homosexual "rights." Good capitalists never ignore a lucrative market.
New Oxford Notes: January 2008
|Read our posting policy
||Add a comment
|"WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees" Maybe someone can explain to me how these wonderful attributes are issues of Human Rights. These people need to be treated as one of God's children, with respect and cordiality. However, converting to their perversion, encouraging or having to listen to their propaganda is neither a requirement nor a right on their part to impose on me. They have the same rights as anyone else: to marry (man and womam), to work (based on their ability on the job) etc. They are not entitled to "marriage" benefits unless they are married. The marriage benefits were provided by society because it was considered beneficial by society to do so. If society decides homosexual et al behavior is beneficial to society, then such rights as deemed appropriate will be provided. The Human Rights set has been snookered by the activists. These days we find all kinds of evil activism being embraced by the Human Rights groups - PC gone awry.
||Posted by: wunsch
February 18, 2008 03:09 PM EST
|Add a comment
A second city council votes to ban pro-life prayer vigils outside abortion clinics.
The Archdiocese of Detroit has created a catechumenate for marriage, an idea rooted in synods and the teachings of JPII.
Msgr. Joseph Han Zhihai, recognized hitherto as a bishop only by the Vatican, is officially installed as bishop of Lanzhou.
Tech giants reversed course this week and dropped opposition to a bill that protects girls from sex traffickers.
The Pope slams the use of cell phones to take photos at papal Masses: 'At Mass, the Lord is there! And you're distracted.'
The U. of Notre Dame says its insurance provider will continue contraceptive coverage on its own.
more news links...