'Gay' Is Good -- For Business
In our New Oxford Note "It's Good for Business" (Dec. 2006), we said: "According to WorldNetDaily.com (Sept. 20 ), the Human Rights Campaign, which advocates for homosexuals, reported that 'an unprecedented 138 major U.S. corporations earned the top rating of 100 percent, up from 101 last year .... Of the 138 major U.S. corporations earning 100 percent [in 2006] were American Express, Bank of America, Charles Schwab, Chevron, Coors, Daimler Chrysler, Eli Lilly, Ford, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, J.P. Morgan Chase, Mellon Financial, Morgan Stanley, Pfizer, Wells Fargo, Xerox, and a host of other companies."
WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees. It measures factors such as non-discrimination policies, diversity training and benefits for domestic partners and transgender employees. An unprecedented 195 major corporations received a perfect score, compared to just 13 companies when the index began in 2002.... Among the companies new to the list this year are Allstate Insurance, Marriott International, Macy's, MasterCard, Yahoo! and Waste Management Inc."
The major corporations are leading the way for homosexual "rights." Good capitalists never ignore a lucrative market.
New Oxford Notes: January 2008
|Read our posting policy
||Add a comment
|"WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees" Maybe someone can explain to me how these wonderful attributes are issues of Human Rights. These people need to be treated as one of God's children, with respect and cordiality. However, converting to their perversion, encouraging or having to listen to their propaganda is neither a requirement nor a right on their part to impose on me. They have the same rights as anyone else: to marry (man and womam), to work (based on their ability on the job) etc. They are not entitled to "marriage" benefits unless they are married. The marriage benefits were provided by society because it was considered beneficial by society to do so. If society decides homosexual et al behavior is beneficial to society, then such rights as deemed appropriate will be provided. The Human Rights set has been snookered by the activists. These days we find all kinds of evil activism being embraced by the Human Rights groups - PC gone awry.
||Posted by: wunsch
February 18, 2008 03:09 PM EST
|Add a comment
Msgr. Dario Vigaṇ resigns as prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for Communication after a public controversy involving the doctoring of a letter by Benedict XVI.
Governor Phil Bryant signs a 15-weeks abortion ban, and within hours a judge temporarily blocks it.
The Vatican releases the full Benedict XVI letter, revealing his concern over a dissident theologian writing on the theology of Pope Francis.
A Vatican tribunal finds Archbishop Apuron guilty of sexual abuse and removes him from office. He will appeal.
New interior minister Horst Seehofer says, 'Islam does not belong to Germany. Germany is shaped by Christianity.'
A death row inmate sues the state over a botched execution. His case emphasizes the inherent flaws in capital punishment.
more news links...