'Gay' Is Good -- For Business
In our New Oxford Note "It's Good for Business" (Dec. 2006), we said: "According to WorldNetDaily.com (Sept. 20 ), the Human Rights Campaign, which advocates for homosexuals, reported that 'an unprecedented 138 major U.S. corporations earned the top rating of 100 percent, up from 101 last year .... Of the 138 major U.S. corporations earning 100 percent [in 2006] were American Express, Bank of America, Charles Schwab, Chevron, Coors, Daimler Chrysler, Eli Lilly, Ford, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, J.P. Morgan Chase, Mellon Financial, Morgan Stanley, Pfizer, Wells Fargo, Xerox, and a host of other companies."
WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees. It measures factors such as non-discrimination policies, diversity training and benefits for domestic partners and transgender employees. An unprecedented 195 major corporations received a perfect score, compared to just 13 companies when the index began in 2002.... Among the companies new to the list this year are Allstate Insurance, Marriott International, Macy's, MasterCard, Yahoo! and Waste Management Inc."
The major corporations are leading the way for homosexual "rights." Good capitalists never ignore a lucrative market.
New Oxford Notes: January 2008
|Read our posting policy
||Add a comment
|"WorldNetDaily.com has reported (Sept. 17, 2007) on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index for 2007, which assigns scores of up to 100 for businesses, "based on employers' treatment of 'gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender' employees" Maybe someone can explain to me how these wonderful attributes are issues of Human Rights. These people need to be treated as one of God's children, with respect and cordiality. However, converting to their perversion, encouraging or having to listen to their propaganda is neither a requirement nor a right on their part to impose on me. They have the same rights as anyone else: to marry (man and womam), to work (based on their ability on the job) etc. They are not entitled to "marriage" benefits unless they are married. The marriage benefits were provided by society because it was considered beneficial by society to do so. If society decides homosexual et al behavior is beneficial to society, then such rights as deemed appropriate will be provided. The Human Rights set has been snookered by the activists. These days we find all kinds of evil activism being embraced by the Human Rights groups - PC gone awry.
||Posted by: wunsch
February 18, 2008 03:09 PM EST
|Add a comment
500 priests sign a statement in support of Humanae Vitae, praising the Church's 'noble vision of procreative love.'
The prime minister says Catholic hospitals will be required to perform abortions. Doctors and nurses will be able to opt out but publicly funded institutions will not.
Chancellor Sebastian Kurz gets death threats after his gov't cracks down on 'political Islam' by closing seven mosques and expelling
up to 60 imams.
In light of the historic Trump-Kim summit, the bishop of Daejeon exhorts all to prepare for the evangelization of North Korea.
The Pope accepts the resignations of three Chilean bishops, including the one at root of a national abuse scandal, Bp. Barros.
Communist authorities forcibly demolish a popular Way of the Cross pilgrimage site in Henan province.
more news links...