Towards a Society that Serves Its People: The Intellectual Contribution of El Salvadors Murdered Jesuits. Edited by John Hassett and Hugh Lacey. Georgetown University Press. 403 pages. $25.
The executions of six Jesuit priests in El Salvador in 1989 dramatically underscored army brutality and proved a decisive factor in bringing about a peace settlement in that war-devastated country. This volume provides an opportunity for the English-speaking world to study the intellectual contributions of three of these Jesuit priest-writers: Ignacio Ellacuria, Ignacio Martin-Baro, and Segundo Montes. (An appended bibliography gives a complete listing of their works; more on their personal lives can be found in Companions of Jesus [Orbis Books].)
Ellacuria, the principal target of the militarys executions, gained prominence as a liberation theologian, then as rector-president of the Central American University (UCA), and as a mediator between the FMLN and the government. In one essay Ellacuria evaluates different attitudes toward change he himself opted for a balanced realism as opposed to naive moralism or fanaticism and ways of relating to popular movements, including Marxist ones. While Marxist movements and liberation theology found common ground, Ellacuria makes it clear that they cannot be equated. The biblical poor embrace much more than the Marxist concept of the proletariat. Christians may be justified in supporting revolutionary movements, but not if they aim (as Marxist ones often do) at bestowing absolute power on the leaders of a movement, nor if they use terrorism or instill hatred of the enemy.
Another Ellacuria essay contains striking details about the inequities engendered by maldistribution of land. In 1976 the government proposed land reform, a modest plan to affect only one-seventh of agricultural regions. A government study of one region showed that five landowning families controlled some 30,000 acres. Their incomes (averaging over $6,000 a day) each matched the total income of nearly 7,000 other farm-working families in the area (with average incomes of 87 cents a day). The reform, which Ellacuria strongly supported, failed to be enacted. The landowners rejected it, but so did the Marxists, who insisted on collective ownership.
Ellacurias other contributions to the volume include a critique of capitalism, reflections on the social role of the Church, and essays on the role of a Catholic university.
Segundo Montes, director of UCAs human-rights institute, received a human-rights award in Washington just three weeks before his death. Montes argues that any attainment of democracy in El Salvador depends on respect for human rights, including socio-economic rights the right to food, education, medical care, work. The constitution of El Salvador guaranteed these rights in principle, but the government impeded their development in practice. Class divisions blocked the realization of rights necessary for a true democracy.
In one essay Montes analyzes the major socio-economic impediments to democracy in El Salvador. Eighty percent of the population had almost no economic power and was functionally illiterate. Marxist attempts to create democracy in Communist countries, on the other hand, failed because Marxists governed over the poorer classes. In other essays, Montes examines the class structure of El Salvador (less than one percent in the dominant class, 77 percent in the dominated, low-pay, or unemployed lower classes), and studies the dominant mode of production in El Salvador (capitalist in its external trade, but semi-feudal in respect to the majority of the population).
Ignacio Martin-Baro, director of UCAs public-opinion institute, focuses on the ideologies and types of thinking that predominated in different sectors of Salvadoran society. His essays cover the appeal of the far Right (the ARENA party), the psychological war used by the government and far Right, the need for a consciousness-raising form of liberation psychology, and the competing ways that religion was used in El Salvador.
I found the articles tremendously stimulating, enlightening, and rewarding. They give real insight into how these priests attempted to understand the reality of El Salvador using very nuanced neo-Marxist analyses at times, but criticizing Marxist socialism in practice in order to help their people attain a true social democracy.
- Arthur F. McGovern
Only the Lover Sings: Art and Contemplation. By Josef Pieper. Ignatius. 60 pages. $5.95.
For readers who honor Pieper, grateful for his books on leisure, the virtues, and medieval philosophy and theology, this new collection shows a genial man who loves inspiring art. Nonetheless, Pieper is no rival to Jacques Maritain for teaching about art and contemplation.
In Only the Lover Sings we find the first premises for a theory of art. Were those premises developed into a comprehensive theory it would still be quite unlike Maritains magisterial theory about the creation and contemplation of art. By recalling Maritains Creative Intuition in Art and Poetry, we can see that he and Pieper differ sharply in their philosophy of art. Maritains book, which sets the standard for reflecting on the artists creative knowledge, began in his Mellon Lectures given in 1952 at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.
Maritain, of course, had extraordinary preparation for philosophizing about art. When young he had set out to be a painter, and his wife, Raissa, was a poet. He numbered among his closest friends gifted poets and painters. In his study of creative intuition, he joined primary insights from depth psychology with Thomistic philosophy, and, by adding this synthesis to his intimate knowledge of the ways in which poets understand their work, he reached an exceptional understanding of the features of spirituality in creative intuition.
Maritain points to similarities between poetic and mystical experience. In both, the knower comes to share, through feeling, something of the nature of the object known. This poetic knowledge, coming via emotionally heightened understanding, can become a natural power for healing and spiritual growth. But it doesnt always have this influence, for in its lower moments the poetic knowledge of artists can become self-centered and prey to mere emotionalism and shallow intellectualism.
For Maritain poetic knowledge is an obscure knowledge through inclination born in the preconscious of the spirit in which the world is known in and through subjectivity, grasped both together and inseparably by means of an emotion become intentional and intuitive. It is a knowledge that always reaches out to things, loving them in all their diversity.
Piepers assumptions about art are far less incarnational than Maritains. For Maritain an artwork reveals a particular artists subjectivity in its involvement with interesting features of the world. In the creation of an artwork, the artist transforms these features by imbuing them with his own spirit. Though the artwork is the focus of interest, it symbolizes the creative self who has made it.
Pieper, for his part, says that those who perceive the artists intention can touch in contemplation the core of all reality, the domain of the eternal archetypes. He says that all authentic fine arts know how to make transparent the truth that all that exists carries the imprint of paradise. Indeed, Art flowing from contemplation does not so much attempt to copy reality as rather to capture the archetypes of all that is.
Though Pieper has written authoritatively about Aquinas, his theory of art is primarily Platonic, even disdainful of worldly things; his interest in art keeps turning toward archetypes and paradise. Maritain is much more the Thomist. The things of Gods creation are interesting, and so too are artists in themselves. Their worth is not primarily a capacity to summon archetypes or give us glimpses of paradise.
Does Pieper, then, simply mislead us about art? No. Many of his remarks give us insights into the proper conditions for comprehending works of art. He recognizes, for example, that to be receptive to music we need to preserve a certain contemplative silence that allows us really to hear it. The danger is that we will be confused by too many sounds. When this happens, our inner life becomes noise.
- Carroll Kearley
Conversations with Robert Coles. Edited by Jay Woodruff and Sarah Carew Woodruff. University Press of Mississippi. 249 pages. $14.95.
The most intriguing fact about Robert Coles found in this fascinating book is, to quote from the matter-of-fact Chronology assembled by the editors: He appears on the cover of Time in February , and in an effort to escape the attendant publicity, moves with family from Massachusetts to New Mexico.
That seems to capture the essence of the man. But listen to his own words: Pride, pride. Of course I wonder whether Ill be an important person and I wrestle with my greed and self-centeredness all the time. So here is a very important person who admittedly craves that importance and yet is appalled, to the pit of his stomach and to the point of doing something about it, by that craving. No wonder his office where he does most of his writing has been called Angst central. No wonder he exclaims, How dare we call ourselves Christians! Its only for Jesus to decide whether we are Christians or not. I dont think Hes made a decision in my case, and Im afraid that when He does I am going to be sent straight to hell.
But remember: St. Paul called himself the chief of sinners. Robert Coles has been called a saint. But he would never, never call himself one which is of course one mark of a true saint.
So here we go in circles, mysterious circles.
Coless favorite book is The Diary of a Country Priest by Bernanos, the great Catholic writer. Of Bernanos, Coles says: I think he knew the Devil rather intimately. As did so many of the saints. As does Coles?
How does Coles differ from, say, the saintly Mother Teresa? Has she done more than he to ennoble the poor? No. The two of them have just done it in different ways. Is she any less of a celebrity than he? No. Does the sin of pride tempt her less than it does him? Probably not.
So whats the difference? Perhaps its a question of Angst. Not unlike Coles, Mother Teresa has been interviewed by media sharpies, gone in front of the klieg lights, spoken to throngs, appeared in full color in slick magazines, rubbed elbows with the powerful. Any Angst in her soul? Probably not much. Why not? Probably because she was personally commanded by the Pope to go out and publicize her work. Why, shes just responding to a call.
Most people think Coles is Catholic. Not quite or, not yet. For that he still requires a laying on of hands. And for his lifes work, perhaps he also still requires if for no one else but himself a kind of laying on of hands, or something so simple and yet so arduous and awesome and humbling as to walk into a confessional and receive, not counseling but the Sign of Absolution. No cheap grace there. No, thats not the same as being deputized by the Pope, but it partakes of the same incarnational essence of the Catholic faith.
Coles understands the cost of discipleship as few others do. But does he fully grasp the call to discipleship? Most everyone whos read Coless spiritual writings knows Who called him. But sometimes he doesnt seem to know. Why not? Is there a missing sacramental link? Its as if Dr. Coles, who seems to feel the full weight of each and every of his sins, plus some imaginary ones perhaps, goes into his closet to confess them to God, but somehow still feels uncleansed, disconnected from the Caller. Is it the case that the doctor/writer whos healed so many in so many ways cannot quite heal himself? Were he to take his burdens to a deputized successor of the Apostles at the foot of the Old Rugged Cross as have so many of Coless Catholic heroes things just might be different. Peace at last?