REMOVING ROAD SIGNS CAN BE DANGEROUS
On the Benefits of Social Stigmas

December 1997By David C. Stolinsky

David C. Stolinsky, M.D., who is of the Jewish faith, lives in Los Angeles. He is semi-retired after 25 years of medical school teaching at the University of California at San Francisco and the University of Southern California.

Not long ago, three young adults in Florida received long prison terms for removing stop signs from a road. Why such severity? The lack of road signs contributed to a fatal collision in which three teenagers died. There was much righteous anger at the irresponsible young adults. But something about the discussion struck me as hollow, even hypocritical. Is it farfetched to suggest that these thoughtless vandals on that road in Florida were only imitating us, their thoughtful elders?

For a generation now we have been busy removing crucial signs from the winding and dangerous road of life. Hoping to be nonjudgmental, wishing to increase freedom, believing even that we were being compassionate, we have almost systematically deprived the young and inexperienced of much of the benefit of our experience. Life holds as many sharp curves, steep grades, and hazardous intersections as ever, but we have conspired to render them unmarked.

For example, we removed most of the signs that warned teenagers of the dangers of premature sex and pregnancy. When I went to school in the 1950s, only one girl became pregnant in six years of junior and senior high. Pregnant girls had to leave school and go live with relatives or attend Continuation School, where returning dropouts went. There was stigma attached to unmarried pregnancy. This was hard on pregnant girls, but because of it there were far fewer of them.

There was little sex education then, but there also was little teenage pregnancy. Pregnancy rates rose as sex education increased, but this unhappy fact has not dampened our enthusiasm for sex education. Indeed, we are convinced that high teen pregnancy rates mean that even more sex education is needed.


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to December 1997 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Though this article was written 9 years ago, it is as fresh and relevant today as it was then. I grew up inthe 60s, when all those road signs were being pulled down and tossed away - and of course was far too ignorant to realize that nothing was being put up in their place. Is it any wonder that my generation, now middle-aged, boasts so many "crashes" of all kinds? Posted by: nrobert2
July 25, 2006 08:32 AM EDT
I would object to only one thing in this article: the author's comment that the errant boy was given a very hard time. If the girl and HER FAMILY were left holding the baby and all that entails, her hard time was in reality, far harder than his. Stigma should be doled out to both sexes, not just the girl. I graduated high school in 1978, four girls became pregnant and they all kept the children. Only one, the one whose father, made sure a shotgun wedding happened, ended up with a happy ending. This girl remains married to this day. The other three "single moms" led miserable lives, particularly when the child was a boy. Posted by: Caroline
July 25, 2006 02:57 PM EDT
Add a comment


©