Whose Money Is It, Anyway?
December 1995By James K. Fitzpatrick
James K. Fitzpatrick teaches high school in the suburbs of New York City.
Some of my best friends are free-market capitalists -- well, okay, I guess I should say some of my favorite economists and political theorists. With the possible exception of a cousin who owns a tavern in Queens, I don't think I know anyone who would fit a capitalist's definition of a capitalist. But I watch Louis Rukeyser and keep up with Forbes and The Wall Street Journal, and agree with much of what I come across in those places about the efficiencies of the free-market system. That should count for something.
I make this disclaimer to assure the reader that I am not a closet socialist of some sort, seeking to undermine free-market capitalism in the name of Catholic social theory. If someone forced me to label my economic preferences, I would say that they are an uneven amalgam, still in the crucible, of Chesterbellocian notions and George Gilder's work. (Yes, I know that presents some dilemmas.)
So I am not posturing when I say that my criticisms of certain modern defenders of the free market are meant to be constructive. I would like to see them become more effective in their attacks on the Big Government types. My fear, however, is that they are setting themselves up for a fall by resorting to overly glib anti-government clichés about the "private" character of wealth in this country.
I am thinking of the kinds of things you hear from Rush Limbaugh and see in the columns of economic libertarians like Walter Williams and Paul Craig Roberts. The line they seem to favor about people "feeding from the public trough" is one example.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.