GUEST COLUMN
A Tale of Two Classics

December 2001By Michael D. Rains

Michael D. Rains, D.D.S., is an orthodontist practicing in Whittier, California. He is the treasurer of Una Voce for Orange County.

During the 20th century two of the world’s largest multinationals dominated their competition. Their “classics” brought each organization universal recognition, even into the most remote recesses of the earth. Each maintained tight centralized control with careful oversight to insure they had the same high quality of product worldwide.

At the close of the second millennium, new managers took control of both multinationals. Grating against tradition, the new managers wanted reflections of their personal tastes. They also demanded a modern taste for the new generation. Both giants introduced their new formulas with great fanfare. The news media had a heyday denouncing the old and cheering the new.

Despite massive publicity campaigns the changes were universal flops. Loyalty to the giants dropped in country after country. Income declined and facilities were closed. Public confidence in both managements eroded.

With sales spiraling down, only one of the giants reacted intelligently. The directors swallowed the bitter pill of pride and management was reshuffled. Their old formula was reintroduced as “Coke Classic.” The management of Coca-Cola learned a hard lesson, and today Coca-Cola again dominates the world market.


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to December 2001 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Be the first to comment on this story!


©