SCIENCE & CULTURE -- PART 1
Is Scientism Winning?

October 2009By Murray S. Daw

Murray S. Daw is the R.A. Bowen Professor of Physics at Clemson University. He received his Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics from CalTech in 1981, and has worked in industry, government labs, and academia. He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Physical Society.

I would like to pose a question: Is the Catholic community retreating from an engagement with science? Many Catholics, scientists and non-scientists, seem to be unaware of the importance or the urgency of this question. It is popularly believed that there should be no relationship between scientific research and the imperatives of the faith. Yet who can deny the enormous and often deadly impact of modern science?

The chasm between science and Catholic culture is a problem not only for Catholic scientists, but also for the wider Catholic community. Pope John Paul II outlined the importance of this problem and identified many of its contributing causes in his 1998 encyclical Fides et Ratio. Since that time, countless seminars and discussion panels have praised the insights of the Holy Father. One must ask, however, if there has since been any real, substantive progress in the understanding and practice of science as it relates to the fullness of knowledge. In order to accomplish the aims laid out by John Paul, we need to move beyond the broad endorsements of Fides et Ratio and toward a fully integrated understanding of science. The proper integration of science into Catholic culture requires nothing less than a full understanding of how science relates to a complete view of faith, of the world, of life as a whole, even of existence itself. Sadly, the great majority of Catholics are unaware that such integration is even possible. Indeed, I assert that the chasm between science and Catholic culture has never been wider.

These difficulties are not confined to the Catholic community. In a very real way, our time and the surrounding culture may be defined by scientific and technological advances, and perhaps even more by the incoherent and confused responses to these advances. The very real crisis of culture that characterizes modernity has its roots in our understanding and use of science.

It is necessary that we Catholics realize that the solution can be found within the Church. The Catholic community can and should lead the way to a fuller understanding of all kinds of knowledge. And yet, modern Catholic culture is not even seriously engaged in, much less leading, the field of science. For centuries, Catholic scientists were to be found at the forefront of advances, but this is no longer true today. Catholic universities have, since their inception, proudly claimed the dual roles of researchers and teachers of science, but this too is no longer the case. Our institutions of higher education — even those that are faithfully Catholic — no longer express a clearly Catholic vision of what science is, how it should be researched, or how it should be taught. Instead, our most faithful institutions of Catholic higher education are shrinking their science curricula. Good, faithful Catholic college students who want to major in science are caught in a bind: There are very few places to study science within a truly Catholic curriculum.


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to October 2009 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
This is an article I will certainly look forward to for the next month. Posted by: tschray
October 30, 2009 05:56 AM EDT
One thing I have always remembered from my highschool days is that true faith and true science go hand in hand. If there is a conflict, then one or both are incorrect. Knowledge involves the search for truth. How can a scientist ignor any conflict between his scientific endeavors and those of other observations he may make? What is it with people today, that they look for a wall between church and science, church and State? What is it with people that join a group, club, society and immediately demand an exception to one of the tenets? I think that Satan has done a good job of undermining principles by confusing those who claim such things. I will have to reread the article for the suggestion of separation of faith and science leaves me very angry and mystified as to the credentials of many so called scientists. Posted by: awunsch
December 07, 2009 01:06 PM EST
I am most fortunate to have discovered the excelellent resource, "The Science Before Science: a guide to thinking in the 21st Century" It is a way forward and a treat to read. I have also recently received the wonderful new book by Fr. Robert J Spitzer S.J entitled "New Proofs for the Existence of God; contributions of contemporary physics and philosophy". While very respectful of science, the average Catholic layman like myself might be very consoled when he or she hears bold worldwide pronouncements like the recent statements of Stephen Hawking,... to find out just how incredibly speculative is the 'science' and even more so , the philosophical naivete that underlies so many pronouncements. Hawking for instance decided to round off the point or singularity that relativity theory posits at the BIG BANG. That's all well and good... but the numnbers added were fictions, not physics. The real numnbers restored the singularity. So too with inflationary cosmology and multiverses. All according the the BVG equations point to a transcendent cause of reality, not physicalist solutions. And there is a war going on. Let's get involved. Don't let your kids grow up defenceless and lost. So-called Naturalism has nothing to offer anyone.
Posted by: P Boire
November 24, 2010 09:26 AM EST
Add a comment


©