Would Offensive U.S. Military Action in the Persian Gulf Be Morally Justifiable?
January-February 1991By Daniel E. Pilarczyk
Daniel E. Pilarczyk is the Archbishop of Cincinnati.
Ed. Note: The following letter, dated November 15 and written at the urging of a majority of the U. S. Catholic bishops, is presented here in abridged form.
I write as President of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. The Catholic bishops of the United States met in our nations capital this week and voted to affirm and make their own the enclosed letter of Archbishop Roger Mahony sent to Secretary Baker on November 7 [see previous article].
We Catholic bishops are heirs of a long tradition of thought and moral reflection on issues of war and peace, including The Challenge of Peace, our pastoral letter of 1983. Catholic teaching reflects a strong presumption against war while admitting the moral permissibility of the use of force under certain restrictive conditions. These traditional just war criteria limit strictly the circumstances under which war may be morally justifiable and also govern the means by which war may be carried out. Now our Conference seeks to apply this tradition to the complex and changing situation in the Persian Gulf. While there may be diverse points of view on the specific application of these principles, our Conference finds significant consensus on four key priorities:
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.