ON AUTHORITY IN RELIGION
The Church in Tension with a Lockean Culture

December 1990By Robert N. Bellah

Robert N. Bellah is Ford Professor of Sociology and Comparative Studies at the University of California at Berkeley, a Contributing Editor of the NOR, and co­author of the award-winning Habits of the Heart.

Ed. Note: The following remarks were presented to the U.S. Roman Catholic bishops on June 23, 1990, at their special assembly at the University of Santa Clara.



It is a great honor for me as an Episcopa­lian layman to address your 1990 special assembly. The problems all Christian churches face in America are similar, but since the understanding of priesthood and episcopacy in my church and yours is so close, what I will say applies on the whole as much to my church as to yours.

I want to begin by highlighting the diffi­culties inherent in some of the central presup­positions of American culture for the under­standing of the church, of priesthood, and so necessarily of the episcopacy, and how these difficulties present problems for the bishop as leader.

In the successor book to Habits of the Heart which my four co-authors and I are presently completing, titled The Good Society, we develop the commonly accepted idea that if there is one philosopher behind the American exper­iment it is John Locke. Locke begins with a state of nature in which adult individuals who have worked and gained a little property by the sweat of their brow decide voluntarily to enter a social contract through which they will set up a limited government, one of the chief responsibilities of which is the protection of their property. There are many peculiarities about this myth, which is one of the funda­mental myths of origin of American society (fortunately not the only one). Where did these adults come from? Did they have no parents? Who took care of them when they were little? How did they learn to speak so that they could make their social contract? Locke leaves us in the dark about all these matters.

Our founders were certainly devoted to the idea of the freedom of the individual, but they linked that freedom to an understanding of economic life that would have consequences they did not expect. It is remarkable how much of our current understanding of social reality flows from the original institutionalization at the end of the 18th century (the “founding”) and how much of that was dependent on the thought of John Locke. Locke’s teaching is one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, ideologies ever invented. Indeed it is proving to be more enduring and influential, which is not to say truer, than Marxism. It promises an unheard of degree of individual freedom, an unlimited opportunity to compete for material well-being, and an unprecedented limitation on the arbitrary powers of government to interfere with individual initiative.


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to December 1990 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Be the first to comment on this story!