Abortion & Last Month's Election
December 1988By John C. Cort
John C. Cort, the father of 10 children, is a Boston-area writer. He has worked as a reporter, editor, union organizer, and Peace Corps and antipoverty official.
The election is over and now we can discuss the question of abortion and partisan politics without endangering the NORs tax exemption.
Let us take a specific example of the abortion discussion before the election and try to conclude, without rancor or emotionalism, whether or not it measured up to the highest standards of truth in general and Catholic orthodoxy in particular.
In its issues of August 19 and 26, The Pilot, official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Boston, ran two editorials on the subject. The first was entitled The Catholic Vote and included the following: There are many moral issues in this years campaign. Does the candidate offer a realistic plan for world peace? A means of helping those who live in poverty? Does he promise to protect the rights of all people?
These are good questions. The editorial then makes a valid point namely, that candidates may agree on the goals and the moral principles involved, but disagree on the practical, prudential judgments that are involved in achieving the goals.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.