The Virgin Birth: Where Science Meets Scripture

December 2015By Maria Hsia Chang

Maria Hsia Chang is Professor Emerita of Political Science at the University of Nevada, Reno, and the author of the NOR articles “Finding the Christ in His Apostles” (Dec. 2013), “Perfect Possession” (May 2009), and “Peering into the Abyss” (Oct. 2008).

A 2013 Harris Poll found that while sixty-eight percent of American adults believe that Jesus is God, or the Son of God, only fifty-seven percent believe in the virgin birth. Disbelief in Jesus being born of a virgin, which is a fundamental tenet of Christianity, in turn implies a belief that the author of the Gospel According to Luke lied when he wrote:
The angel Gabriel was sent from God to a town of Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph…. The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. Behold you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus….” But Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?” And the angel said to her in reply, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.” (1:26-35; emphasis added)
Biblical scholars use various methods to assess the truthfulness of the New Testament accounts of Jesus. One is the Criterion of Embarrassment, according to which it is human nature to write in a manner that puts the author and his cause in a positive, instead of embarrassing or negative, light. The authors of the canonical Gospels are no exception. And so, with this criterion in mind, it is reasonable for us to infer that biblical passages that place Jesus or His mother in an unflattering light, such as Mary’s premarital pregnancy, are likely to be true.

According to Hebrew law and customs at the time, an unmarried girl who became pregnant could be stoned to death. When Mary told Joseph that she was with child, Joseph had every reason to fear, not just for Mary but for himself, because in the eyes of the community he would be the obvious culprit. Joseph, therefore, faced a dilemma: If he married his fiancée, it would be an admission that he had had relations with her before marriage, which meant he would live the rest of his life with a tainted reputation. Not to marry his betrothed, however, would mean abandoning Mary to a life of shame at best, or at worst, death.

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to December 2015 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Truly fascinating. I await the results of more scientific inquiry! Posted by: mysticdavidsparks
December 26, 2015 07:53 AM EST
Add a comment