November 1995By Robert Coles

Robert Coles is Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Humanities at Harvard Medical School, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, and a Contributing Editor of the NOR.

These days in the privileged precincts of America, gluttony is an all too evident aspect of our existence -- the overweight ones as victims, the determinedly thin ones as prideful winners in a constant war against temptation. I doubt Adam Smith and other early apologists for capitalism ever imagined how central to its survival a hyped-up consumerism would one day become -- the endlessly clever and manipulative messages that tell us to want more and more, hence by implication to live, always, on the very edge of dissatisfaction. Every day, in countless shopping malls across the land, millions of us assemble in an almost desperate effort to acquire things, as if our very worth as human beings is at stake. Young people in droves use those same malls as hang-outs, places to pass the time of day, places where they can gawk and themselves be regarded, and trysting places too -- in movies and restaurants and in the nearby armies of cars, themselves a memorial to a progression of sorts: from a helpful convenience to an economic and social necessity, not to mention a psychological instrument that lends itself to all sorts of symbolic expressions, all sorts of idiosyncratic needs, aspirations.

For many years I never did understand why such a desire to get, to have, to buy and buy, to eat up, to wear then set aside in favor of tomorrow's garb, to drive this car -- why all that hungry inclination to possess, to own (and show to others) amounts to a serious sin. Gluttony and greed struck me as serious, present-day vices, but not especially evil in a spiritual sense. But during my Catholic Worker days (when I had the opportunity to help out at a "hospitality house," and talk at some considerable length with Dorothy Day), I began to learn otherwise -- learn from her, and others close to her, not the virtues of asceticism (a misconception in the minds of some: that she and Peter Maurin were committed ideologically to a kind of Catholic Puritanism), but the distinct danger of a materialism that gets out of hand, becomes outright gluttony, hence sin. Here is Dorothy Day to help us, me, in 1968, to understand the progression I have just mentioned -- a response, on her part, to my inquiry as to her attitude toward possessions: "I'm not the one to judge others -- I have enough to do trying to keep myself in line [with respect to moral matters]. But I know -- from personal experience, that's how I know -- that anything, just about anything can turn into a trap for us: we want it, we get it, we want more, and more, and more -- and we're not [thereby] only greedy, we're ‘sinful.'"

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to November 1995 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
A good and insightful article.

I have also noticed in the last several months, amid all our economic and political turmoil, a growing gluttony of a new kind. Well, I guess it's not really new in kind, but a new recrudescence of an ages-old gluttony. And that is a gluttony centered on security secured by having less.

It seems there is a huge surge in the isolationist/suvivalist/slightly agrarian kind of thinking. Lots of people, webisites, and books are urging us to get rid of all debt, grow all our own food, convert to solar and wind power and so on. These things are all good--I'm trying to reduce debt and have always grown a big garden--but lately most of it is an attempt to become "independent" and achieve security--to get rid of all contingencies. I'm especially alert to this because I have these tendencies myself.

But security in this world is one thing we can't really have. The whole thing seems like an inversion of the parable about the guy who had a bumper crop, built bigger barns, and then kicked back to enjoy life, which turned out to be brief. Now, we want to tear down our big barns and build smaller ones that we have more chance of hanging onto without outside help. It's a panting after security, a kind of gluttony.
Posted by: mlhearing
April 20, 2009 09:58 AM EDT
Add a comment