Eugen Drewermanns Trivialization of Theology
October 1992By John Warwick Montgomery
The Rev. John Warwick Montgomery, a Lutheran clergyman, is a practicing barrister and Principal Lecturer in Law and Human Rights at Luton College in England. He divides his time between London and Strasbourg.
We thought wed heard it all. The 1960s gave us Episcopal Bishop James Pike in America (Ive jettisoned the Trinity, the Virgin Birth, and the Incarnation), Anglican Bishop J.A.T. Honest-to-God Robinson in England, and the post-Bultmannians on the European continent. The 1970s and 1980s spawned process theologians and liberation theologians aplenty. On the Roman Catholic front, each successive book by Hans Küng has cut away more material from what was regarded as a seamless garment, so that infallibility is no longer found anywhere not even in Holy Scripture.
Now along comes Eugen Drewermann, a 51-year-old priest and psychotherapist, who, until removed from his position in September 1991, was professor on the Faculty of Theology at Paderborn. Although now under discipline so that he cannot officially preach, he is still carrying on spiritual conversations after Mass and is the most popular Roman Catholic theological author in German-speaking Europe. His 38 books, many of them bestsellers, have sold more than a million copies. Der Spiegel featured Drewermann in its pre-Christmas (December 23, 1991) issue, and the interview became a cover story this year in LAutre Journal, a major magazine of opinion in the French-speaking world.
What does Drewermann believe? As is common in such cases, it is easier to state what he does not believe. He is against clerical celibacy, an all-male priesthood, and the Roman Catholic Churchs position on the remarriage of divorced persons. To be sure, such views could derive and have been derived by some classical Protestant divines from serious (though perhaps erroneous) biblical exegesis. Exegesis, however, is not Drewermanns forte.
For him, the Scriptures are to be understood in a symbolic, humanistic fashion. He agrees with Bultmann that the historical portrait of Jesus in the New Testament is thoroughly impregnated with nonhistorical, mythological elements, but he disagrees with Bultmann that the Bible should therefore be demythologized for myth is vital psychologically. Thus, of the Ascension, Drewermann says: We can only understand the Ascension as a symbol of elevation above human anguish . Those who look at it any other way are professing not the faith but superstition. At the same time, in a spirit of liberal tolerance, he declares: Each person ought to have the right to believe in a manner that helps him or her remove anxieties. I am the last person to label a belief heretical.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.