A Catholic Looks at Conspiracy

September 2004By Vincent A. Droddy

Vincent A. Droddy has an M.S. in Computer Science, an M.A. in International Relations, and is currently working on an M.A. in Theology.

What is a Catholic to make of conspiracy theories? Should we join the ranks of "kooks" and "paranoids" and become conspiracy theorists?

I have no special knowledge of any particular conspiracies. I've never been part of an "inner circle" of anything. Still it is relatively easy to reason about conspiracies.

Consider the following list of proposed conspiracies: a Stalinist conspiracy to starve the Ukraine into submission, a Nazi conspiracy to commit a Jewish Holocaust, an international Communist conspiracy, a military-industrial complex that acted as President Eisenhower suggested, a "vast right-wing conspiracy" aimed at "getting" the Clintons, a conspiracy of organized crime syndicates to provide alcohol illegally during Prohibition or to provide illegal drugs today. You would be hard-pressed to find a single person who claims that all these conspiracies were make-believe.

In its Latin origin, the verb "to conspire" means simply "to breathe together." Any group of people coming together in secret to plan for an objective are conspirators. Given our fallen, sinful nature, it is a fact of life that sinners will conspire together to commit sins. Our legal system makes conspiracy to commit a crime illegal. Common parlance includes many words indicating the existence of conspiracies: organized crime, smuggling rings, accomplices, spies, covert activities, assassination plots, insider trading, collusion, and so on. Intrigues and plots have been the engine of much of history.

Then there is the theory of "unconscious conspiracy." Although fallen men naturally tend to act in their own self-interest and accumulate and abuse power and wealth when able, it is said that elites pursue their common interests without necessarily being organized or conspiring. But elites gather in the same social settings, attend the same schools, engage in the same recreational activities. The theory of "unconscious conspiracy" assumes that they, having all these things in common, rigorously avoid conspiring, when lesser, non-elite mortals would do so given the same opportunities. Charitable organizations often work together to promote their goals. It is ridiculous to presume that individuals hungry for wealth and power would stubbornly refuse to collaborate. It seems reasonable, therefore, to provisionally accept any conspiracy theory for which there is credible evidence.

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to September 2004 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Well, here's a conspiracy: Caiphas and other "priests" conspired with Judas to capture Jesus and then have him falsely charged and crucified. They planned it. Judas went along with the plan. They conspired. Money changed hands. It all worked out except for that Resurrection thing. Posted by: Chapman
July 26, 2006 11:06 AM EDT
“His answer to the question, "Is there a single, overarching conspiracy that rules the world? Catholics can answer this simply: Yes, and it is led by Satan." is naive and childish. Please read Carol Quigley's Tragedy and hope (excerpts are on internet) for a real answer!
Or read Quadragesimo Anno about the finance oligarchy (#103-109).

If he wants to find a true conspiracy, instead of looking into town halls, he should examine the Federal Reserve.

He confuses government secrecy with conspiracies, and omits the most important one that is being organized by humans

He also fails to mention free masonry.

On the other hand, Communism and Naziism were open, there were no secret that they wanted to rule the world.
Posted by: blueskies
March 01, 2009 12:59 AM EST
Add a comment