'No Enemies to the Left' - Still!

July-August 2001By Kenneth D. Whitehead

Kenneth D. Whitehead, a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education, is a writer living in Falls Church, Virginia, and a Contributing Editor of the NOR. His latest book is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic: The Early Church Was the Catholic Church (Ignatius, 2000).

Ideological slogans may not always seem to be very important. Sometimes, however, they can reveal basic and persistent mind-sets. This is the case with the slogan that originated in the French Revolution, "No enemies to the Left." Students of European politics will recognize that this slogan has persisted, and that the ideas behind it still apply to today's politics.

In his 1928 classic, History of the French Revolution, Pierre Gaxotte describes the inexorable logic of revolutionary "progress":
The revolutionary period was characterized by allowing successive avant-garde parties or factions to take political power while riots and disturbances in the streets dictated the actual government policies that were adopted. Against the royal court and the privileged classes, the members of the National Assembly appealed to the turbulent sectors of the capital. Even while privately deploying the excesses committed from July 13 on, they dosed their eyes to them because they wanted to hold in reserve the power of the dubs and of the streets. Thus they became prisoners of the alliance they had made; they became prisoners of the formula "no enemies to the left" (pas d'ennemis à gauche).
The relative moderates initially responsible for getting the Estates General convoked in order to deal with the financial crisis of the French monarchy were very soon shunted aside by the more radical elements, who quickly resorted to extra-legal means to convert the Estates General into a National Assembly. These revolutionaries in the Assembly soon fell from power, however, giving way to yet more radical elements. Each successive party or faction that came to power faced the same ongoing, volatile revolutionary situation.

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to July-August 2001 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
One who is 'left behind' is perceived to be not right; The one who is on the left thinks he is extremely right; the one who is on the right is feverishly trying to 'conserve' whatever he has left in the annals of political correctness that will inevitably result into historical incorrectness - for how can something be correct now if it will be wrong later?

Meanwhile, the little old lady, unconcerned about the barrage of rethorics and euphemisms flying all over her head, just keeps going back to the local church to adore the Blessed Sacrament and prays her little 'weapon', the Rosary that appears useless to many, but scares the hell out of the devil only to find himself back in it. And she is very consistent in aiming for the Center of the Sacred Heart, knowing He sits at the right hand of the Father together with the Mother.

Sometimes I wonder if there isn't after all, genius in naivete and continuously hiding stupidity in being 'articulate' and 'sophisticated'. We see a bunch of them in the realm of politics, among self-proclaimed 'theologians, and in the world of ivy leagues academe.
Posted by: humblesoldier
January 23, 2009 03:30 PM EST
Add a comment