Newmans Prophetic Challenge to Clericalism
June 1989By Anthony Anderson
Anthony Anderson is a seminarian at Holy Apostles Seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut.
John Henry Cardinal Newman, the great precursor and prophet of Vatican II, challenged the Catholic Church of his day with his ideas about the laity. He challenged laymen to sanctify both the temporal order and the Church. And he challenged the clergy to co-operate with and utilize the energy, wisdom, and holiness contained in that vast member of the Mystical Body of Christ called the laity. Thanks to Vatican II many are now aware of the laymans call to sanctity in the world and his duty to transform the world. But Newmans challenge still stands: There is still widespread misunderstanding of the role of the lay person in the Church.
Perhaps the greatest misunderstandings in recent years have come from the left. Vatican II has been used to clericalize the laity and laicize the clergy. But we must also avoid the equally hazardous overreaction of the right. For if wild innovation can damn, so can that cramped protection of the deposit of faith which keeps it from Gods people and prevents its implementation and legitimate development. Newman should be our ideal of that authentic orthodoxy which transcends liberalism and conservatism. And to better implement the teachings of Vatican II on the laity we should study Newmans thought. After all, he has been called the absent Council Father and was cited during the Council with greater frequency than any other authority, including Aquinas.
Newman was a visionary. Although he was unswervingly faithful to the Church, he recognized certain problems with the Church of his day. He realized that the Church must change if it is to remain at its best. Said he: To live is to change, and to be perfect is to have changed often.
To fulfill his vision of a dynamic and holy Church, Newman wanted to change the role of the laity. He saw a divided Catholicism: the laity and clergy were detached from one another. According to many Catholics of Newmans day, only bishops, priests, nuns, and brothers are called to sanctity and to activity in the Church; everyone else is to essentially passive. Monsignor Talbot, an English contemporary of Newmans, considered laymen only good enough to hunt, to shoot, to entertain. These matters they understand, but to meddle with ecclesiastical matters they have no business at all. Happily, Vatican II rejected this clericalism which would keep the layman ignorant servile. But how many real challenges and responsibilities has the layman been given in the Church in the 1980s? Being an extraordinary eucharistic minister at Mass is undoubtedly a privilege, how does it hasten the coming of Gods kingdom? Does it bring people into the Church? Does it stretch ones mind and soul?
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.