Last Judgment (Lite)
June 2001By John M. Grondelski
John M. Grondelski, a moral theologian, writes from London.
One critic has trenchantly observed that todays dissident theologians are really closet ultramontanes: They are devoted to the teaching of the next Holy Father, whom they expect will reform Church teaching to their liking. The problem is that such a Pope never materializes.
Such expectations were dominant in the mid-1970s in the latter years of Pope Paul VIs pontificate. The same voices (from many of the same people) are again being heard, claiming that once Wojtyla is gone, a new Pope will get us back on the road to utopia.
Since the Holy Spirit apparently did not co-operate during the 1978 conclaves, some dissidents are now hedging their bets. John Hogue, however, projects his bets onto the end of the world! In his book The Last Pope: The Decline and Fall of the Church of Rome, Hogue uses the Prophecies of St. Malachy as a backdrop to advance his politically-correct views. The prophecies are supposedly the visions of the Irishman, St. Malachy, predicting each of the Popes who would reign between his time and the end of the world. According to the prophecies, two are left: John Paul IIs successor, and the Pope who reigns at the end of the world.
Malachys prophecies usually consist of a brief phrase about each Pope, often highly enigmatic and patient of varying interpretations (the correct one usually the result of Monday morning quarterbacking). Catholics now await the last two popes: De Gloria Olivae (the Glory of the Olive), followed by Petrus Romanus (Peter the Roman).
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.