GUEST COLUMN
Why Is the European Union Bullying Poland & Hungary?

May 2018By Michael Wisniewski

Michael Wisniewski is a civil servant in the New York area and earned a graduate degree in Public Administration from Villanova University.

What compels a bully? Some would argue that outward shows of force disguise a deep, interior weakness. Even animals, when confronted by competition or a perceived threat, intimidate their rivals into submission by manifesting their power. Thus, bullying can be simultaneously considered a defense mechanism and a coercive tool.

Bullies are relentless. When I was a child, the preferred instruments of their ridicule were sticks and stones, but their appetite for inflicting pain grows increasingly insatiable with age. Among adults, the most vicious attacks are hurled with words.

The European Union (EU) arose out of the ashes of World War II to reconcile bitter rivals West Germany and France, and eventually the rest of Western Europe, as a pan-European federation of independent member states. It accomplished this remarkable task not by sidelining national sovereignty for the collective good, as that approach had proved unsuccessful in East Germany and across the Soviet Union; rather, it was founded on the shared values common to all members. The Treaty of Lisbon, the 2007 amendment to the EU’s constitutional basis, affirms that those shared values are respect for human dignity and human rights, freedom, democracy, equality, and the rule of law. How the EU applies those founding principles varies according to different member states, however, and it has an inconsistent track record.

The EU would have us believe that the chief current threats to its founding values are the conservative Law and Justice Party in Poland and the Fidesz Party in Hungary. Despite the fact that both parties are in power due to overwhelming public support, the EU perceives their policies as undemocratic because they challenge the bloc’s status quo. The EU has publicly opposed both democratically elected governments on a number of issues, ranging from judicial and constitutional reform, migrant policy, and media reform to logging in ancient forests, all of which are characteristically in the EU’s purview but are pursued in a manner that is unprecedented and hostile.


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to May 2018 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Certainly if one frames the issue as a conflict between a hypocritical and “bullying” EU and Poland or Hungary, the author has a point. But there are other reasons to criticize the governments of those countries. One should look at the statistics on how many (rather, how few) refugees those countries have taken in. And Poland’s law on Holocaust “defamation” is foolish and self-defeating. Furthermore, its over-heated debate with Ukraine over mutual wartime atrocities serves no interests but Russia’s. We should support these great Catholic nations, but not without just criticism of their governments. Posted by: Andrii
July 09, 2018 10:53 AM EDT
Add a comment