Why Is the European Union Bullying Poland & Hungary?
May 2018By Michael Wisniewski
Michael Wisniewski is a civil servant in the New York area and earned a graduate degree in Public Administration from Villanova University.
What compels a bully? Some would argue that outward shows of force disguise a deep, interior weakness. Even animals, when confronted by competition or a perceived threat, intimidate their rivals into submission by manifesting their power. Thus, bullying can be simultaneously considered a defense mechanism and a coercive tool.
Bullies are relentless. When I was a child, the preferred instruments of their ridicule were sticks and stones, but their appetite for inflicting pain grows increasingly insatiable with age. Among adults, the most vicious attacks are hurled with words.
The European Union (EU) arose out of the ashes of World War II to reconcile bitter rivals West Germany and France, and eventually the rest of Western Europe, as a pan-European federation of independent member states. It accomplished this remarkable task not by sidelining national sovereignty for the collective good, as that approach had proved unsuccessful in East Germany and across the Soviet Union; rather, it was founded on the shared values common to all members. The Treaty of Lisbon, the 2007 amendment to the EUs constitutional basis, affirms that those shared values are respect for human dignity and human rights, freedom, democracy, equality, and the rule of law. How the EU applies those founding principles varies according to different member states, however, and it has an inconsistent track record.
The EU would have us believe that the chief current threats to its founding values are the conservative Law and Justice Party in Poland and the Fidesz Party in Hungary. Despite the fact that both parties are in power due to overwhelming public support, the EU perceives their policies as undemocratic because they challenge the blocs status quo. The EU has publicly opposed both democratically elected governments on a number of issues, ranging from judicial and constitutional reform, migrant policy, and media reform to logging in ancient forests, all of which are characteristically in the EUs purview but are pursued in a manner that is unprecedented and hostile.
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.