The Problem of the Pastor's Dog

May 2007By Joseph L. Lennon

The Rev. Joseph L. Lennon, O.P. is a former Vice President of Providence College in Rhode Island.

An owner treats his dog like family. Both live together in a bond of great intimacy and affection.

Priestly dog ownership raises a trifling but ticklish question: Should a pastor house his dog in the rectory? Moral theologian Francis J. Connell, C.SS.R., replies with an equivocal "yes and no."

Neither divine law nor the general law of the Church forbids a priest from owning a domesticated carnivorous canine. The propriety of using the rectory as a dog house is, however, an arguable point.

Bishops rarely lay down rules regarding a priest's in-house pets. On this topic, Canon Law is silent. Holy Writ mentions the dog over 40 times, but mostly in terms of contempt and aversion -- e.g., "As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his folly" (Prov. 26:11) and "Do not give dogs what is holy" (Mt. 7:16).

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to May 2007 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Only a heretical, modernist, communist, or an Islamofaciest would argue against keeping a dog. Dogs are loved by God Himself. God gave us dogs for our sanity - especially those who bite! Of course, a chihuahua isn't exactly a "dog" in the best sense of the word. It is, unfortunately, something more akin to a rat.

"Dogs are great. Dogs are good. Let us thank them for their fur. Amen!"
Posted by: SgtMajUSMCR
April 21, 2008 03:19 PM EDT
Add a comment