What Are Clothes For?

April 2003By Inez Fitzgerald Storck

Inez Fitzgerald Storck is a writer and stay-at-home mother and grandmother living in Greenbelt, Maryland.

Este artículo: en español

[Fashions] express the decision and moral direction that a nation intends to take: either to be shipwrecked in licentiousness or maintain itself at the level to which it has been raised by religion and civilization.

-- Pope Pius XII

The female sex has, generally speaking, always been extremely interested in every aspect of clothing. Women enjoy everything from planning purchases to ornamenting or accessorizing items in their wardrobe and, especially, talking about clothes. Tendencies to excesses in style and quantity have always existed. Today as never before, though, we see misuse of women’s attire in three main areas: lack of modesty, immoderate quantity well beyond the realm of need, and use of clothing to escape reality. In view of these excesses it is important to examine the purpose of clothes in order to discern a reasonable approach.

What are clothes for? Pope Pius XII in his 1957 address to the Congress of the Latin Union of High Fashion enumerated these purposes: (1) hygiene, which refers primarily to protection from the elements; (2) decency and modesty, which protect the body from becoming a source of disordered sensuality and sexual desire; and (3) adornment.

With regard to the first of these, there is not much cause for concern in our country. Even the poor need not endure the cold because of lack of warm coats, with free clothing readily available from numerous charities. With decency and modesty, it is an entirely different issue. Any mother who has tried to find an appropriate graduation or prom dress for her daughter knows that low cut, immoderately short, and tight dresses are the rule.

Apparently many women do not realize the effect of even the clothed female body on men. I remember the puzzlement of a college friend when a young man asked her, "What does it feel like to be wrapped up in that beautiful form?" Most of us women walk around not realizing that we are like magnets, always potentially drawing gazes of admiration -- or lust. It is up to us to eliminate the latter by avoiding provocative apparel. Do we want to be the cause of impure thoughts, or, worse, come-on comments or conduct? For we have it in our power to be a near occasion of sin incarnate. We must care enough about men, even those who are strangers, not to put them to the test. Single women who are dating need to be doubly careful to dress modestly, as we are the guardians of purity. It behooves mothers to set a good example for their daughters.

You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.

Back to April 2003 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
Thanks for an interesting perspective. Nice job.

I've heard that 75% of retail stores in this country are for women. That's a startling statistic. Rather than criticizing men for not buying more and newer clothes, women might follow their example.

Because feminists attack men so often and with such libel and slander, I do not hesitate to return the drivel by saying that if women had more responsibility for the transporation and production of clothing, etc., they'd likely buy much less.

Try working on an oil derrick at sea or building and maintaining infrastructure and the stores and utilities, and ... well, most (open-minded) people get the picture.
Posted by: j17ghs
August 21, 2007 04:49 PM EDT
Add a comment