February 2000By J. A. Gray
J. A. Gray is Deputy Editor of the NOR.
The cover says Consenting Adults? Sex and the Academy, and the entire September-October 1998 issue of the magazine Academe, which is The Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, is devoted to sex. About a third of the magazine is devoted to defending homosexuality and extolling it as the coolest thing on campus. But that comes at the end. The issue opens with, and spends most of its pages pondering, a different and fairly simple question: Is it okay for teachers to have sex with students? Academe is written for teachers, but even a non-teacher say, a parent with a college-bound child, or an alumnus being asked for a donation, or a legislator considering more funding for higher education may be interested in how the nations pre-eminent academic professional journal answers that question.
The Editor starts off the discussion. Theres no centerfold in this issue of Academe, she says perkily, nor is there a consensus. Peoples opinions vary as widely as their practices. Within the academy, intelligent, enlightened, and well-meaning individuals can be found on all sides of the topic.
Already the reader must pause: Is this writing and thinking of university caliber? The joke about no centerfold falls flat and is strangely flippant: What exactly is there to joke about? The attempt to suggest complexity the wide variations and the many, many sides is labored and hence suspect. (How many sides can there be? The non-academic reader figures that in the end there are only two, Yes and No.) Then comes the string of fawning adjectives, which displays several vices of prose composition that should have been cured back in freshman English: gratuitous compliment, trivial truth, and innocuous proposition. Let us grant that there may be persons who can be called enlightened and well-meaning scattered on various sides; even if true, this is trivial. The substantive question is: On which side are the unenlightened and ill-meaning individuals gathered? Trying to answer that question would make for an editorial worth reading. But the Editor doesnt even hint that such creatures may exist among our nations academics.
Several articles then proceed to treat the question of sex between teachers and students, and reading them I was reminded of Omar Khayyáms old verse about his experience among the scholars:
You have two options:
- Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
- Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.
If you're already a subscriber log-in here.