ESCHEWING SECURITY, HEADING FOR THE PERIPHERIES
On Pilgrimage with Pope Francis

January-February 2015By Raymond T. Gawronski

Raymond T. Gawronski, S.J., is a professor of dogmatics at St. Patrick’s Seminary & University in Menlo Park, California. This article was originally delivered as a talk at St. Patrick’s for the Knights of Malta on October 1, 2014.

In the Book of Revelation, a great voice from the throne says, “The former things have passed away” (21:4), and the One who sits upon the throne says, “Behold I make all things new” (21:5). If there is one thing that holds true about the election of Pope Francis, it is the novelty, the newness of it. Three “firsts” go a long way toward unlocking the enigma of the Bergoglio papacy: He is the first pope from the New World, and within that, of course, the first pope from Argentina. He is the first pope to call himself Francis. And he is the first Jesuit to become a pope.

Novelty often seems to contain within it a disregard for tradition. The two previous popes lived through what appears to have been the destruction of European civilization, of which the concentration camps are perhaps the most apt symbol. These popes’ concerns were largely to save Europe for the faith, and to save the faith for Europe and the world. Although St. John Paul II in particular reached out to the entire world, he remained profoundly rooted in the Catholic tradition of a Europe that had once been Christendom: His journeys were missions from that base.

Though John Paul called himself a pope “from a far country,” his homeland is but a long day’s drive from Rome. It is really Pope Francis who comes from the other side of the world. In a remarkable way, Jorge Bergoglio — son of northern Italy, though born in Argentina — returned to Europe from a different continent, and a different way of seeing reality. With the transition from “old world” popes to a “new world” pope, it is as if the settings on a kaleidoscope that had been fixed for many centuries were suddenly turned. In C.S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia, Lucy Pevensie opines that people from south of the equator are so different because they spend all their lives “upside down.” Sometimes the differences between Francis and his predecessors are so striking that one is tempted to agree with her.

In a manner of speaking, we are all “on pilgrimage with Pope Francis.” What does it mean to be a pilgrim? A pilgrim has to be poor, has to be open to whatever God may give him. A pilgrim leaves settled routines, securities of all kinds, to place himself unreservedly into the hands of God and God’s providence. It is this leaving of all security in things of tradition and custom that Pope Francis seems to be accentuating. He seems to be calling those of us who live in the New World to share deeply in his own desire to “make all things new” in Christ, without being hamstrung by “the past.”


You have two options:

  1. Online subscription: Subscribe now to New Oxford Review for access to all web content at newoxfordreview.org AND the monthly print edition for as low as $38 per year.
  2. Single article purchase: Purchase this article for $1.95, for viewing and printing for 48 hours.

If you're already a subscriber log-in here.



Back to January-February 2015 Issue

Read our posting policy Add a comment
"What is it in the Jesuit charism that God has chosen to place at the center of the Church’s governance today?"God does not choose the Pope, cardinals do.
Also, I have always understood Catholicism's strength to be its"both/and" ability. But Franics seems an "either/or" personality despite his famed openess. When you say "the “new evangelization,” ... cannot simply be a repeat of the old baptism of the nations or only a catechesis or moral instruction," I have to ask, but shouldn't it include these things. Or are we like Francis to eschew conversions and affirm atheists? This piece wants to be positive but is essentially cliched. I expect better from NOR. pro-francis piece should include reason, not just rhetoric.
Posted by: j.mart
February 12, 2015 12:44 AM EST
Another "interpretive" article to explain the "Jesuit Way" of Pope Francis. Really? No explanation is required to understand PF. Over the last 2 years his comments and actions have clearly demonstrated and confirmed that is all about "Feelings" over "Intellect" aka "Modernism". It's that simple. No need for any further linguistic gymnastics, explanations or excuses. They have become overly tiresome. Forget what he says and watch what he does. The recently deceased Jesuit, Cardinal Martini, a liberal modernist, was/is his self admitted hero. Enough said! This is not complicated. PF is doubling down on the modernist disaster known as Vatican II. The results will be the same. What's that definition of "Insanity"?...Something about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results? Therefore, with all due respect you will excuse me if I decline the invitation to join the PF pilgrimage bandwagon for it is on that wide road paved with good intentions and warm feelings. Somewhere, I heard about choosing a wide road versus taking the narrow path? My recollection is that the former leads to perdition aka Hell. Posted by: Jacobumsays
January 23, 2015 11:10 AM EST
Add a comment